Suggestions
Suggestions Notes
Our research on shame in child rearing across cultures requires further study and analysis in order to determine how the practice works and its effects. The field of inquiry requires both greater depth and breadth. In terms of depth, it would be helpful to conduct a study which examines the different types of shaming and how they relate to different types of norms. We synthesized Funk and Siekh’s studies by stating that the third and fourth stages of Funk’s socializing emotions process connects with Siekh’s self-regulation theory. This synthesization work should continue in order to create more nuanced approaches to norm creation. There are also many developments to consider in terms of widening the breadth of research. As noted by Sznycer et al. (2016), the focal point of subsequent studies should be distantly related cultures to further examine the ways that the divide between ethnotheories exist. We looked at work that divided cultures into collectivist and individualist value systems, but we know that even among one ethnotheory, there can be a great amount of discrepancy and variation. As such, such researchers should consider what other dimensions might go into norm creation. Additionally, scholars should study the differences in shame and shaming practices in urban and rural communities in order to fully establish the relationship between the norms of communities and the way shame is used. There is also further research required on shame and disability. One study examined the proneness to guilt, shame, and pride in children with Autism Spectrum disorders. This research could help to identify the ways that shame is used to support special education environments and other spaces where neurodivergent children exist.